Re: [PATCH 3/3] setup: always honor GIT_WORK_TREE and core.worktree
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:50:26
Maaartin [off-list ref] writes:
On 11-01-19 13:42, Jonathan Nieder wrote:quoted
Unfortunately the existence of GIT_WORK_TREE makes it tempting to use without setting GIT_DIR.Maybe I'm asking nonsense, but why should I always use both? On the command line, I either cd to my (alternate) working tree and use GIT_DIR only or the other way round.
As long as you were at the root level of these two sets of "working trees", you don't need GIT_WORK_TREE at all. We originally had only GIT_DIR and people who wanted to use a working tree without an embedded .git (hence having to use GIT_DIR) complained that they cannot work from subdirectories while cd'ing around, because you declare that you are at the root of your working tree by using GIT_DIR (naturally, there is no discovery of .git so we won't know where the root is). GIT_WORK_TREE was added to augment the mechanism to allow them to specify where their root is, so that they can set both and then chdir around inside their working tree.