Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [off-list ref] writes:
2010/12/22 Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]:
quoted
quoted
const char *get_git_work_tree(void)
{
- if (startup_info && !startup_info->setup_explicit) {
-...
- }
return work_tree;
}
Would it be a bug in the new set-up code if this function gets called and
work_tree is still NULL?
There are quite a few callers that call get_git_work_tree() and expect
that it will always return a non NULL pointer. Perhaps we would want an
assertion here?
While the assertion sounds good, it does not work well. The old
function can return NULL in bare repos. is_bare_repository() and
is_inside_work_tree() expect NULL from get_git_work_tree() sometimes.
Ok, don't bother changing anything in that case---it won't help us much.