On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] wrote:
Am 12/14/2010 8:43, schrieb Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy:
quoted
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Am 12/14/2010 6:32, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
quoted
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
All paths should not exceed PATH_MAX, right?
Your PATH_MAX may be a lot shorter than the PATH_MAX on the system I
created my trees on that you are reading.
And that is not just gray theory: On Windows, PATH_MAX is whopping 260
characters!
Does that mean Windows won't accept any path longer than that, or
PATH_MAX is defined just for fun?
It is the limit for path names that we can have without MAJOR extra
efforts. It is not a limit implied by the file system.
Just googled around and found this [1]. I'm going with strbuf so it
can be reallocated if necessary. A bit tricky because "base" can be
moved, but I think it's worth it.
[1] http://insanecoding.blogspot.com/2007/11/pathmax-simply-isnt.html
--
Duy