Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2010, #01; Sat, 4)

From: Yann Dirson <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:50:11

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:13:46 +0900
Miles Bader [off-list ref] wrote:
Yann Dirson [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
But then, why not simply use --find-renames (since --detect-renames
has luckily not been released ontl the masses yet), and avoid
making similar-usage opts dissimilar and then adding a synonym just
to make them similar the other way ?
"Find" and "detect" have different nuances.

"Detect" sounds somewhat passive/minor, so "detect renames" makes it
more clear that renames are detected _in addition_ to normal
processing.
Seen that argument before.
1. does anyone care ? (I personally don't)
2. whether we care or not we have IMHO to face the implications, see my
other mails about implications of both paths

-- 
Yann Dirson - Bertin Technologies
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help