On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:15:34AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Thanks; the changes from the last round all look sensible to me, but did
you know that the last round has already been in 'next' for a few weeks by
now already?
Oops... Sorry. :-/
If you don't mind I'll turn these three into the following and queue as
4/3 on top of what is already merged, as reverting the merge with the old
series and merging the new round to 'next' makes it messier than it
already is.
I tested applying that patch. Doesn't seem to break things at least code-
wise (no surprise, it only adds headers and adds one conditional that only
evaluates to false on invalid input).
So I don't mind applying that patch. Acking the patch.
-Ilari