Re: [PATCH] use persistent memory for rejected paths

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:31:33AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Hmmm, all calls to add_rejected_path() seems to be with ce->name as the
path parameter,

Yes. All of them except for the leading path checks I introduced
recently. In that code path we have to report untracked files which
do not have a corresponding index entry.

That is true but I wonder if the order should be "whatever the processing
order happens to be" in the first place, as this is a report to the end
user, no?  Perhaps "collect in strlist, sort at the end before showing" is
a more desirable thing to do?

Is the order of processing not alphabetic? It is at least in the
tests that I touched.

Clemens