Re: git as an sfc member project

quoted

quoted

The draft agreement is here:
  http://peff.net/git-sponsorship-agreement.pdf

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:03:48AM -0700, Tait wrote:

quoted

This agreement brings up one concern for me. It would make officially
make git a United States project based out of New York, and therefore
subject to the laws of New York and the United States. Among whatever
other laws apply, will be export restrictions and patent law. I don't
know whether any part(s) of git would be a concern under those laws
(and I haven't needed to care, until now). Is legal advice for issues
like this part of the services SFC can provide?

Jeff King wrote on the 27th of October:

I am not sure that joining the SFC is going to make any difference
with respect to those things. Developers and distributors of the
software in the United States were already subject to such laws, and I
don't see how our dealing with the SFC would create any special
obligation for those outside the US. In particular, it seems to me
that git as a legal entity signing this agreement as the SFC (which
legally is really just an agreement between the SFC and a few members
of the project) is different from git as a community of individuals
who happen to contribute and distribute code.  SFC will not own any
copyrights, nor take any responsibility for distribution.

I believe what Jeff says is basically correct.  The "Git Project" will
be part of a non-profit in New York, and it's true that the Git Project
could be therefore be subject to the laws of New York.  However, it
isn't that much different of some Git developers being in New York and
being subject thereto.  Developers outside the USA continue to operate
as volunteers for the project and aren't impacted any more than they
already are participating in an unincorporated project.

Nevertheless, I'm going to check in with Conservancy's lawyers to verify
there are no serious disadvantages to Git joining a USA non-profit that
weren't already the case anyway since some developers are in the USA
anyway.  I'll respond back when I hear from them.
-- 
Bradley M. Kuhn, Executive Director, Software Freedom Conservancy