Re: [PATCH 00/11] More consistant terminology ("remote-tracking branch", "not updated")

Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:

Jakub Narebski wrote:

quoted

Matthieu Moy [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

this is an attempt to be more consistant in the terminology used in Git.

Thank you very much for your work!

Yes, seconded!  

Actually, I did the easy part ;-) (easy grep-able patterns, and
uncontroversal solution).

There's still a mess about the "upstream/downstream" Vs
"remote-tracking" terminology, both in the UI (--track options here
and there) and the doc.

And I'd really like the "index/cache/stage" thing to be fixed too. I
like "stage/staging area" best, but it seems this part does not make a
consensus (yet?).

I'm just hoping I gave the right example and someone else will now
take care of these two ;-).

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/