Re: [PATCH] Make test script annotate-tests.sh handle missing authors
From: Jakub Narebski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:49:48
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Kevin Ballard wrote:
On Oct 16, 2010, at 12:34 AM, Jakub Narebski wrote:quoted
Kevin Ballard [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Also, I'm not a Perl programmer, so it's possible there's a better idiom for this sort of thing. t/annotate-tests.sh | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)diff --git a/t/annotate-tests.sh b/t/annotate-tests.sh index 396b965..4e37a66 100644 --- a/t/annotate-tests.sh +++ b/t/annotate-tests.sh@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ check_count () {cat .result | perl -e ' my %expect = (@ARGV); my %count = (); + while (my ($author, $count) = each %expect) { + $count{$author} = 0; + }First, it is a very bad practice to have variables of different type named the same way, here %count (hash) and $count (scalar, unused).Thanks for the pointer, but $count is already used in the while loop below: while (my ($author, $count) = each %count) { my $ok; if ($expect{$author} != $count) { $bad = 1; $ok = "bad"; } else { $ok = "good"; } print STDERR "Author $author (expected $expect{$author}, attributed $count) $ok\n"; }
Hmmm... the %count hash should probably be named %actual (to complement %expect), or %attributed (like in output). -- Jakub Narebski Poland