Am 04.10.2010 11:21, schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
- unsigned mode = canon_mode(S_IFREG | 0644);
+ unsigned mode = canon_mode((S_IFREG | 0644));
That doesn't look pretty.
How about something like the following instead? It untangles the
?-:-chain in canon_mode and allows passing of an argument with side
effects. All the S_ISxxx macros get a single variable as parameter.
Does it fix the issue on NetBSD?
---
cache.h | 13 ++++++++++---
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
index 2ef2fa3..3d5ed51 100644
--- a/cache.h
+++ b/cache.h
@@ -277,9 +277,16 @@ static inline int ce_to_dtype(const struct cache_entry *ce)
else
return DT_UNKNOWN;
}
-#define canon_mode(mode) \
- (S_ISREG(mode) ? (S_IFREG | ce_permissions(mode)) : \
- S_ISLNK(mode) ? S_IFLNK : S_ISDIR(mode) ? S_IFDIR : S_IFGITLINK)
+static inline unsigned int canon_mode(unsigned int mode)
+{
+ if (S_ISREG(mode))
+ return S_IFREG | ce_permissions(mode);
+ if (S_ISLNK(mode))
+ return S_IFLNK;
+ if (S_ISDIR(mode))
+ return S_IFDIR;
+ return S_IFGITLINK;
+}
#define flexible_size(STRUCT,len) ((offsetof(struct STRUCT,name) + (len) + 8) & ~7)
#define cache_entry_size(len) flexible_size(cache_entry,len)--
1.7.3