Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-clone: describe --mirror more verbose

Steven Rostedt venit, vidit, dixit 01.10.2010 23:16:

On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 13:18 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:

quoted

2010/10/1 Uwe Kleine-König [off-list ref]:

quoted

Some people in #linux-rt claimed that you cannot define "--mirror" with
"mirror".

I'd say "mirror" is a commonly known term for an exact copy. Moreover,
the text below doesn't explain what a mirror is either, only how
"update" behaves in it.

quoted

quoted

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>

Acked-by: Darren 'Some People' Hart <redacted>

  Acked-by: Steven Rostedt [off-list ref]

-- Steve

quoted

quoted

---
 Documentation/git-clone.txt |   11 ++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-clone.txt b/Documentation/git-clone.txt
index dc7d3d1..5eedfbd 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-clone.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-clone.txt

@@ -128,7 +128,16 @@ objects from the source repository into a pack in the cloned repository.
       configuration variables are created.

 --mirror::
-       Set up a mirror of the remote repository.  This implies `--bare`.
+       Set up a mirror of the remote repository.
+       Using
+
+               git remote update origin
+
+       (or `<name>` instead of `origin` if -o is given) in the resulting

"remote" has no "-o" option. You probably mean the "clone" option, but
the way it's written it refers to the preceding command.

quoted

quoted

+       repository overwrites the local branches without asking.
+       This implies `--bare`.

Again, "this" refers to the preceding sentence. But the update behavior
does not imply "--bare". Specifying "--mirror" for "clone" implies "--bare".

quoted

quoted

+       Without --mirror (but with --bare) git remote update doesn't touch any
+       branches at all.

That's not true. It just doesn't touch any local branches; it updates
the remote branches, of course.

I'm sorry but I can't consider this patch an improvement.

Michael