Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCHv6 07/16] t3600 (rm): add lots of missing &&

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:49:41

Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
Maybe you would prefer something like this on top?  My only concern is
to make sure the test is robust (even if people add new tests before
these without paying much attention) and easy to read.

I suppose I am nitpicking excessively because I do not like to see
regressions, even in out-of-the-way code like this.
I do not think you are nitpicking at all; it is a key to maintainability
to make sure that the code is unlikely to be broken by future changes that
are not perfectly diligent.

Thanks.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help