Re: Multiple checkouts active for the same repository
From: Gustavo Narea <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:49:36
I guess it all comes down to one thing: How can I avoid Git's feature of making only one branch/checkout active at a time under the same path? I need to have the branches and their checkouts on different directories, and it seems like the only way to do it is having one repository per branch/checkout, which doesn't look like the ideal way of doing things in Git. Apart from the situation I describe in the initial email, there's another limitation in the development environment: Our IDE, Eclipse + Pydev, assumes each project (i.e., branch/checkout) to be on different directories and each project should have different settings (e.g., paths to dependencies, which could be different), but with GIt everything would be a single project because it's all on the same path. Thanks in advance. - Gustavo. On 24/09/10 10:29, Gustavo Narea wrote:
Hello.
We're currently migrating from another DVCS, which allows us to have
working copies of each branch in separate directories, so that their
code can be used simultaneously. However, I haven't found a way to do
this with Git, at least not an easy way. Can you please help me?
We are a team of Web developers and testers working on an application.
There are always a few development branches and a stable branch, and
testers need all the branches with the very latest code available at all
times.
The way we handle it at the moment is very simple because the server
hosting the remote repository is the same that hosts the deployed
instances of each branch, so when we push to the remote repository, the
code for each site is automatically updated.
We use the following structure:
/srv/repositories/project/branch1
/srv/repositories/project/branch2
/srv/repositories/project/branch3
Is there any simple way to do this with Git? I can only think of two
options that involve hooks:
* Have a hook that exports each branch to a directory like
/srv/repositories/project/branchN
* Have one Git repository per branch, so that each repository have a
different checkout active. Then the main remote repository will
have post-receive hooks that trigger a pull on each individual
I'm not particularly happy with either way. Is there a better solution?-- Gustavo Narea. Software Developer. 2degrees, Ltd. <http://dev.2degreesnetwork.com/>.