On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:45 PM, FernandoBasso
[off-list ref] wrote:
On 09/22/2010 12:52 AM, Andrew Keller wrote:
quoted
The only thing is, in your example, since master did not progress since
testing diverged,
git simply thinks of it as being "behind" testing...
You have used the word 'behind'. I think 'time' what is making me fail to
understand git merging. It depends on which branch I have changed last.
Not really. Time is irrelevant, what matters is the common ancestor.
Please, run gitk and take a look at the history graph. I think it will make
some things obvious. They say one picture is worth a thousand words...
Dmitry