Re: [PATCHv4 1/2] daemon: add helper function named_sock_setup

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:46 PM, AlexanderS [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:12:52 +0200
Erik Faye-Lund [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Since serve() isn't a library function, wouldn't it reduce needless
code churn to just make socklist a set of global variables (or just a
global struct)? That way you don't have to pass it around, changing
all those function prototypes.

I don't understand: Even if I make socklist a global structure or
something like that, I also have to change all this function prototypes
to remove at least the old unused parameters.

You are of course right, strike my comment :)