Re: [PATCH 0/2] log/ format-patch improvements

Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
...

quoted

Good idea. I'll write a patch. Do we also want people to be able to
turn off `--no-merges`?

I don't see a need for it.

However, if you can think of good names for --undo-no-merges and
--undo-merges options to "git log", that might be a nice independent
change for the revision option parser.

Wait a bit.  How would you represent a merge in a patch form that can be
read by "git apply" (and "patch") in the first place?