Re: [feature request] gitweb: tags in history

Hi Jakub,

On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 01:22:05 -0700 (PDT), Jakub Narebski wrote:

Jean Delvare [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

I have a feature request for gitweb. In the history view, I would like
to be (optionally) able to see the tags, interlaced with the actual
commits. The idea is to get an immediate view of all commits that
happened between specific tags.

The actual format for displaying the tags can certainly be discussed, I
have no strong opinion on this myself. We may want to let the admin
filter which tags should show up that way, maybe even letting him/her
define primary and secondary tag formats (think main releases vs.
release candidates) for nicer output. Then we may want to group (or
hide) tags when a file hasn't been modified in a long time. But these
are implementation details, even the raw functionality would be quite
useful IMHO, and hopefully not too difficult to implement.

Currently in 'shortlog' view you can see 'ref' markers... which
include tags.

For example 'shortlog' view for 'maint' branch has the following
fragment:

 2010-07-28 	 Matthieu Moy	 Document ls-files -t as semi-obsolete.
 2010-07-27 	 Junio C Hamano	 Git 1.7.2.1  [v1.7.2.1]
 2010-07-27 	 Junio C Hamano	 Sync with 1.7.1.2
 2010-07-27 	 Junio C Hamano	 Git 1.7.1.2  [v1.7.1.2]
 2010-07-27 	 Junio C Hamano	 Sync with 1.7.0 series
 2010-07-27 	 Junio C Hamano	 Git 1.7.0.7  [v1.7.0.7]

where e.g. [v1.7.2.1] is ref marker for 'v1.7.2.1' tag.

If you have something different in mind, please provide moackup,
either as ASCII-art, or link to HTML or image.

Yes, visually this would be very fine with me.

But shortlog is a repository-wide view, while I need the same for
history which is a file-specific view. Things are obviously a little
more complex there, because for a given file, it is statistically
unlikely that each commit affecting the file in question corresponds to
a tag. So we have to find the best tag to display in front of
each commit (easiest bet would be the next tag time-wise) and maybe
improve a bit from there (for example by not showing the same tag
twice). But then again I would be very happy with a relatively raw
output for the time being.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare