Re: [PATCHv4 2/2] pull --rebase: Avoid spurious conflicts and reapplying unnecessary patches
From: Santi Béjar <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:49:18
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Elijah Newren [off-list ref] wrote:
Prior to c85c79279df2c8a583d95449d1029baba41f8660, pull --rebase would run
git rebase $merge_head
which resulted in a call to
git format-patch ... --ignore-if-in-upstream $merge_head..$cur_branch
This resulted in patches from $merge_head..$cur_branch being applied, as
long as they did not already exist in $cur_branch..$merge_head.
Unfortunately, when upstream is rebased, $merge_head..$cur_branch also
refers to "old" commits that have already been rebased upstream, meaning
that many patches that were already fixed upstream would be reapplied.
This could result in many spurious conflicts, as well as reintroduce
patches that were intentionally dropped upstream.
So the algorithm was changed in c85c79279df2c8a583d95449d1029baba41f8660
and d44e71261f91d3cc81293e0976bb40daa8abb583. Defining $old_remote_ref to
be the most recent entry in the reflog for @{upstream} that is an ancestor
of $cur_branch, pull --rebase was changed to run
git rebase --onto $merge_head $old_remote_ref
which results in a call to
git format-patch ... --ignore-if-in-upstream $old_remote_ref..$cur_branch
The whole point of this change was to reduce the number of commits being
reapplied, by avoiding commits that upstream already has or had.
In the rebased upstream case, this change achieved that purpose. It is
worth noting, though, that since $old_remote_ref is always an ancestor of
$cur_branch (by its definition), format-patch will not know what upstream
is and thus will not be able to determine if any patches are already
upstream; they will all be reapplied.
In the non-rebased upstream case, this new form is usually the same as the
original code but in some cases $old_remote_ref can be an ancestor of
$(git merge-base $merge_head $cur_branch)
meaning that instead of avoiding reapplying commits that upstream already
has, it actually includes more such commits. Combined with the fact that
format-patch can no longer detect commits that are already upstream (since
it is no longer told what upstream is), results in lots of confusion for
users (e.g. "git is giving me lots of conflicts in stuff I didn't even
change since my last push.")
Fix the non-rebased upstream case by ignoring $old_remote_ref whenever it
is contained in $(git merge-base $merge_head $cur_branch). This should
have no affect on the rebased upstream case.All this makes sense. But can you explain when it happens? One possibility is when you don't fork from the tracking branch as in: Subject: Difference between pull --rebase and fetch+rebase Message-ID: [ref] From: martinvz <redacted> and this patch should also fix martinvz's issue (I've CC martinvz, can you test this patch? Thanks). Can you refer to commits with something like this? c85c792 (pull --rebase: be cleverer with rebased upstream branches, 2008-01-26) alias.one !git --no-pager show -s --pretty='tformat:%h (%s, %ad)' --date=short
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <redacted> --- git-pull.sh | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ t/t5520-pull.sh | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)diff --git a/git-pull.sh b/git-pull.sh index a09a44e..54da07b 100755 --- a/git-pull.sh +++ b/git-pull.sh@@ -206,18 +206,6 @@ test true = "$rebase" && {git diff-index --ignore-submodules --cached --quiet HEAD -- || die "refusing to pull with rebase: your working tree is not up-to-date" fi - oldremoteref= && - . git-parse-remote && - remoteref="$(get_remote_merge_branch "$@" 2>/dev/null)" && - oldremoteref="$(git rev-parse -q --verify "$remoteref")" && - for reflog in $(git rev-list -g $remoteref 2>/dev/null) - do - if test "$reflog" = "$(git merge-base $reflog $curr_branch)" - then - oldremoteref="$reflog" - break - fi - done } orig_head=$(git rev-parse -q --verify HEAD) git fetch $verbosity $progress $dry_run --update-head-ok "$@" || exit 1@@ -273,6 +261,28 @@ thenexit fi +if test true = "$rebase" +then + oldremoteref= && + . git-parse-remote && + remoteref="$(get_remote_merge_branch "$@" 2>/dev/null)" && + oldremoteref="$(git rev-parse -q --verify "$remoteref")" && + for reflog in $(git rev-list -g $remoteref 2>/dev/null) + do + if test "$reflog" = "$(git merge-base $reflog $curr_branch)" + then + oldremoteref="$reflog" + break + fi + done + + o=$(git show-branch --merge-base $curr_branch $merge_head $oldremoteref) + if test "$oldremoteref" = "$o" + then + unset oldremoteref + fi +fi +
You've moved all the lines after the call to "git fetch". It changes the behavior when the reflog is not enabled, as the old value of remoteref is lost. Thanks Santi