Re: Git thinks a failing command doesn't exist
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:49:18
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 19:25, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:12:38PM +0000, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:quoted
Has this been noted before: $ git rebase --continue .: 986: Can't open /home/avar/g/git/.git/rebase-merge/author-script git: 'rebase' is not a git command. See 'git --help'. Did you mean this? rebase Rebase failed, but the help mechanism seems to just test the exit code, or something similar.Which git version and which platform? There is code in run-command to check for an exit code of 127 (which is what posix shells should produce for a missing command), and to set ENOENT in that case, which is what execv_dashed_external notices for a missing command.
It's 1.7.2.1.295.gdf931 on Debian testing. Which is pu as it was on
midnight UTC (I build it from cron) + these patches (which shouldn't
matter):
# Monkeypatches
git cherry-pick 041bc904d2 # t/lib-git-svn.sh: use
$PERL_PATH for perl, not perl from $PATH
git cherry-pick 855a1f8836 # commit: fix test broken by
jn/commit-no-change-wo-status
git revert --no-edit 48e46574e6 # rebase -i: add exec command to
launch a shell command
So either your shell is producing that exit code for a different case, or git is broken.
My shell is Debian /bin/dash 0.5.5.1-6. Unfortunately the error with rebase was some one-off thing that I couldn't reproduce. I'm not even sure /what/ I did to make it happen.