Re: With feature branches, what is ever committed directly to master

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 14:02, Bradley Wagner
[off-list ref] wrote:

what kind of stuff is ever committed
directly to "master" or is master
typically the place where things are
merged into from other stable/features
branches?

Is "master" really even unstable at
that point?

Thanks in advance! I realize this
question is pretty open-ended.

See here:

  http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git;a=blob_plain;f=MaintNotes;hb=todo

The `master' branch is indeed considered the most stable version of
the software when it comes to the way `git' itself is maintained.