Re: jk/tag-contains: stalled

Thomas Rast [off-list ref] writes:

Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

*1* Also we would want to do something similar to the commit.util field so
that more than one utility libraries can attach their own stuff to each
commit.  It _might_ make sense to instead get rid of commit.util and
migrate the users to a separate "one object hash per one type of info",
though.  In any case it is a separate topic.

I thought this already existed in decorate.c?

Yes, the point is that there may be cases where it may be better to
migrate some current commit.util users to that API.