Kris Shannon [off-list ref] writes:
On 31 July 2010 23:56, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 15:24, Matthieu Moy
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Marc Branchaud [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
The name of the command may be subject to discussions. I've chosen
"run", but maybe "shell" would be OK too. In both cases, it doesn't
allow the one-letter version since both "r" and "s" are already used.
"exec" with one-letter "x"?
Thanks, that sounds good, yes. Any other thought?
I like "exec".
or (t)est.
testing is one possibility, but you may want to do other things, like
pick <commit> ...
exec perl -pi -e 's/foo/bar/g' file.c; git add file.c; git commit --amend
or whatever. "exec" is definitely the best proposal.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/