Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
And actually, we should probably have a
test_commit_notag() then.
I don’t know. What’s so bad about using "git commit" directly?
I often find myself using "git commit" in tests because test_commit
imposes all the usual restrictions for a ref name on the commit
message. I would happily use an abbreviation for
test_tick &&
git commit -m "something" &&
git tag something-else
if available because I don’t like typing, but would that help the
reader and test runner any?
(That’s not a rhetorical question. A patch that answers in the
positive would be fine by me. ;-))