Re: help with distributed workflow/signoff

On 07/14/2010 05:46 PM, Brock Peabody wrote:

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason<avarab<at>  gmail.com>  writes:

quoted

Well, consider that even if you push most patches through, the peer
review you get from having a setup similar to Git's own might very
well be worth it. Everyone makes mistakes, having a second set of
eyeballs to look at your code eliminates a lot of that.

That may not be acceptable to your corporate culture, but consider
that most big corporations (e.g. Google) do detailed code review
before anything gets commited to the master repository.

Yes, that's a good point.  We are trying to improve our code review processes,
and I think switching to git is going to help with that down the road.  I don't
want to make the switch to git and a heavier (if better) process at the same
time, however, as it would decrease the chance of either being accepted.

Have you investigated Gerrit Code Review?