Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:
I am probably making a complete shell fool out of myself by overlooking
something completely trivial.
I don't think so. I don't know what the double-loop is trying to achieve
myself.
We could even lose to_skip variable and the call to test_done inside the
case statement, perhaps like this.
Thanks.
t/test-lib.sh | 13 +++----------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index ac496aa..bc06564 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ test_skip () {
case $this_test.$test_count in
$skp)
to_skip=t
+ break
esac
done
if test -z "$to_skip" && test -n "$prereq" &&@@ -829,16 +830,8 @@ this_test=${0##*/}
this_test=${this_test%%-*}
for skp in $GIT_SKIP_TESTS
do
- to_skip=
- for skp in $GIT_SKIP_TESTS
- do
- case "$this_test" in
- $skp)
- to_skip=t
- esac
- done
- case "$to_skip" in
- t)
+ case "$this_test" in
+ $skp)
say_color skip >&3 "skipping test $this_test altogether"
say_color skip "skip all tests in $this_test"
test_done