Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, 14 June 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote:
...
quoted
Is the last "1;" still needed if we did this?
Probably not, and probably we never need this.
quoted
I am guessing that this new codeblock will go inside "sub run" when
merging with your c2394fe (gitweb: Put all per-connection code in run()
subroutine, 2010-05-07) and Sam's a0446e7 (gitweb: Add support for
FastCGI, using CGI::Fast, 2010-05-07). If I am mistaken, please advise.
No, the code is meant to be after last code to be run in gitweb,
in *top level* scope, otherwise it would always return.
Ok, tentatively I fixed the mismerge of 'pu' from the last night and
pushed it out.