Erik Faye-Lund [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Funny, as '>>' is basically meaningless. At least 'remote:' has semantic value (ie. it indicates _where_ something is coming from).
How about '> ', which often means "quote" (e.g in e-mails)? Would that
be appropriate?
Not much better, IMNSHO. Where do people get the idea that line-noises
are more descriptive than "remote:"?