Re: [PATCH next v2] log_ref_setup: don't return stack-allocated array
From: Thomas Rast <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:57
Erick Mattos wrote:
2010/6/10 Thomas Rast [off-list ref]quoted
-int log_ref_setup(const char *ref_name, char **log_file) +int log_ref_setup(const char *ref_name, char *logfile, int bufsize) { int logfd, oflags = O_APPEND | O_WRONLY; - char logfile[PATH_MAX]; - git_snpath(logfile, sizeof(logfile), "logs/%s", ref_name); - *log_file = logfile; + git_snpath(logfile, bufsize, "logs/%s", ref_name);
[...]
I don't see any improvement here. Unless you want to get rid of using references on calling functions which is only going to add another buffer to the stack, sized PATH_MAX, once that log_file is going to be really allocated in the heap after git_snpath(). As folks use to say here: "changing six by half a dozen".
What the - side of the hunk above does is returning a local (stack
allocated) variable, in the form of a pointer to logfile. Once those
go out of scope, you have zero guarantees on what happens with them.
Try the following snippet, it should cause a similar problem:
#include <stdio.h>
int* f()
{
int i;
i = 42;
return &i;
}
int main()
{
int *p = f();
if (1) {
char buf[1024];
memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
}
printf("I got: %d\n", *p);
}
Only in this case the issue is so obvious that the compiler will warn
(at least mine does).
I haven't ever seen this happening so I think you have found some particularity of valgrind which could route a patch to it.
Admittedly my experience is somewhat limited since I don't do C coding
outside of git and some teaching. But so far I have not had a single
false alarm with valgrind (when compiled without optimizations;
otherwise the compiler may do some magic).
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch