Thread (21 messages) flat view 21 messages, 8 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: RFC: Making submodules "track" branches

From: Jens Lehmann <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:56

Am 09.06.2010 01:19, schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 23:09, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Wouldn't it be enough to say --ignore-submodules for your day-to-day work,
without lying in the gitlink entry in the superproject tree?  An entry
"submodule.foo.branch = fred" in your .gitmodules will still tell your
local git to update the submodule worktree to work on 'fred' branch.  At
least, an arrangement like that would allow the build infrastructure to
use --no-ignore-submodules when running its equivalent of GIT-VERSION-GEN
to notice that what you are building is using something different from
what the superproject specified to use in the submodule, while not bugging
you with differences you do not care about (or you already know about and
are irrelevant to the change you are working on).
Yes I think that's even better, to have no entry in the superproject's
tree at all, and just a repo/branch pair in .gitmodules.
Thats not how I understood Junio proposal, but an alternative to using
0{40} could be to just drop the submodule entry from the tree. You get the
same result, but maybe less problems with older versions of git.

Less confusion and the same features.
Not knowing the version of a submodule looks to me like a very powerful
source of confusion, but maybe thats just me ;-)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help