Re: Need to change old commit (and regenerate tree)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:50
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 00:09, Andreas Schwab [off-list ref] wrote:
Antriksh Pany [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Instead of (what I initially expected): A--------o--------o--------o--------o(old B)--------o--------o--------o(old C) A2--------o--------o--------o--------B--------o--------o--------C So what I am missing here? Aren't the new commits B~1, B~2, B~3 identical to C~4, C~5, C~6 (respectively) in all ways so as to have gotten them the same SHA1 and hence appear as what I expected them to appear?No, they have a different commit time, which is also part of the hash.
Indeed.
To avoid this, you have to:
- rebase B on top of A2 first,
git rebase --onto A2 A B
- rebase of C on top of the new B.
git rebase --onto B B_old C
("git rebase --onto B A C" should work too, as usually git is
smart enough to see
that A-B_old is already applied. Use "git rebase --skip" if it isn't)
If A is an ancestor of A2, you can simplify to:
git rebase A2 B
git rebase B C
(Disclaimer: the examples without --onto I use almost daily, the ones
with I don't)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds