Re: git pull

On 17 May 2010 15:51, matteo brutti [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi,
i'm learning about git and soon have a question.
My repo is in /dev/sda6 and my home is in /dev/sda4, as are both in
local i thought that when i committ, i'll found the files on repo
changed, it was not so! I learn i have to use git pull, but i didn't
understand why.
I made some tries, put my repo in /home/user/myrepo cloned in
/home/user/myclones changed files and committed and the changes was in
the repo without any need of pulling, and i have permission to write
to /dev/sda6, so why have i to pull changes?

Thanks.


Matteo

If you clone repoA into repoB, then you commit some new changes to
repoA, you won't see the same changes in repoB unless you pull them
from repoA.

I don't think it matters whether or not they are in the same partition or not.

As far as I understand, if you clone within the same partition, the
object database might be hard-linked. This won't affect what files you
have checked out though. It would just mean that you won't need to
"fetch", because the objects are already there.