On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:14:15AM +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
However, if INDEX, WORKTREE and EMPTY are preferred as syntactic sugar
tokes, then that is fine by me. Unfortunately, I do not have the time
nor the knowledge needed to add support for the INDEX and WORKTREE
tokens, so I am afraid I will have to leave this as a suggestion for
the future.
Implementing INDEX and WORKTREE would be quite challenging. EMPTY is
easy because it is really just a fake ref for a particular sha1. The
others need special casing everywhere that might look at the result.
So certainly if you want to do EMPTY, I wouldn't let the lack of the
other two hold you back. The only reason they are related at all is that
they would probably share a syntax, if the other two ever even get
implemented.
-Peff