[PATCH/RFC] clone: have progress report mention top level dir, not git dir · Pete Harlan <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH/RFC] clone: have progress report mention top level dir, not git dir · Jeff King <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH v2 0/2] clone: simplify progress message · Pete Harlan <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH v2 1/2] clone: have progress report mention top level dir, not git dir · Pete Harlan <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH v2 2/2] clone: add bare clone to the progress message · Pete Harlan <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] clone: simplify progress message · Jeff King <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] clone: simplify progress message · Michael J Gruber <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH] clone: report check out for non-bare clones · Michael J Gruber <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH] clone: report check out for non-bare clones · Junio C Hamano <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH] clone: report check out for non-bare clones · Michael J Gruber <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] clone: simplify progress message · Pete Harlan <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] clone: simplify progress message · Michael J Gruber <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] clone: simplify progress message

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:46

On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 01:09:14PM -0700, Pete Harlan wrote:

quoted

I guess it comes down to how much detail we want to show.

For me it isn't only a matter of detail; I find "Cloning into
bar/.git" misleading, since bar is getting more than a .git directory.

Yeah, I can buy that line of reasoning. Junio's nitpick aside, I think
most users perceive the clone process as creating the whole "bar"
directory.

Thank you for looking at this.  I agree with you, and have added a
second patch that implements that.

These patches look good to me. I agree with Junio about just squashing
them.

-Peff