Re: git diff flags
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:46
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 03:41:56PM -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote:
There's something strange with how `git diff' parses its flags:
Yep.
git diff --some-bogus-flag --> complains as expected
Yep.
git diff --follow
--> works but there's no mention of this in the man page, and it
doesn't look like it's doing anything--follow is a "diff option" even though it is about revision traversal. This is an artifact of the implementation, where rename-following happens at a low level where we have only diff_options. It should be possible to fix, though (parse the option at the revision layer, but have it set the diff_options flag).
git diff -C -M --> works as expected too
Yep.
git diff -CM --> doesn't say anything (but it does exit with an error code)
The revision and diff parsers do not use parse_options, and thus don't understand things like bundling. Even if they did, -C takes an optional argument. In this case, the argument format is bogus, so it aborts, but for some reason there is no error message (it is the same with -B, -M, and -C).
git diff -CM --I-can-write-anything here! --> does the same
Because we barfed at -CM already. It only looks funny because we didn't bother to print a message. Patches welcome. -Peff