On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 20:39 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 1 May 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Yes, that assumption is a gross POSIX violation but we so far haven't seen
any platform that matters in real life that assigns the IFMT bits
differently.
Indeed. Just out of interest - Alan, what _is_ the crazy platform that
doesn't match what absolutely everybody else has always done?
You don't want to know :-)
But if you really must, it's an Atari platforms running FreeMiNT, but
was also essentially Atari's own MultiTOS as well which they adopted
from the original MiNT project.
Alan.