On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 14:30 -0700, Michael Olson wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Instead, fall back to assuming that the incoming merge is a bunch of
cherry-picks and ignore it.
Signed-off-by: Michael W. Olson <redacted>
---
git-svn.perl | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-svn.perl b/git-svn.perl
index 0e1feb3..1a53709 100755
--- a/git-svn.perl
+++ b/git-svn.perl
@@ -3110,7 +3110,7 @@ sub check_cherry_pick {
my %commits = map { $_ => 1 }
_rev_list("--no-merges", $tip, "--not", $base);
for my $range ( @ranges ) {
- delete @commits{_rev_list($range)};
+ eval { delete @commits{_rev_list($range)} };
}
for my $commit (keys %commits) {
if (has_no_changes($commit)) {
If the _rev_list here fails, it means it was passed in a bad range.
This means that the calling code somehow ends up with a commit ID
which doesn't exist. It's normally better to detect errors when
they happen, not deeper into other functions when they break things...
Sam