Sverre Rabbelier [off-list ref] writes:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 22:59, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Thanks. The end results look good to me, too.
Hmm. Do we want to get this into 1.7.1? With how much debate this
series has had I don't see much added benefit from having it cooking
in next.
I don't think this is that _urgent_, but on the other hand I don't think
this is with heavy-enough impact that needs to be out of the coming
release either. As long as there aren't any glaring factual errors or
formatting breakages, I think it is safe to merge it and get it over
with ;-).