Re: Possible bug in Git
From: Avery Pennarun <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:39
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Avery Pennarun [off-list ref] writes:quoted
So what git tries to do is reduce the diff output of a merge commit down to just the "unexpected" parts: the parts that are different from what you'd get if you just merged in the individual changes in the obvious way.This (and everything you said after this paragraph) is not quite correct. What is shown is the pieces that do not match either of the parent. So if you have a conflicted merge and resolve it by taking what one side did literally (think: "merge -X ours"), that hunk becomes uninteresting because the end result matches what one of the parents had.
Hmm, but David also said:
quoted
quoted
git show commit:path shows empty file: $ git show dac6a95f5:facturacion/facturacion/scripts/lineasfacturascli.qs | wc 0 0 0
The output seems to match neither parent in any way, and yet the simplification has resulted in no diff at all. Strange, no? Avery