Re: [WIP PATCH 1/4] Prepare checkout_entry() for recursive checkout of submodules
From: Jens Lehmann <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:36
Am 10.04.2010 20:44, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Jens Lehmann [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
quoted
This would give you an incorrect result if .git is a file that records "gitdir: overthere" (see read_gitfile_gently() in setup.c); I would expect it would become a fairly important ingredient if we ever enhance the submodule support to add submodule that disappears/reappears in the history.Right. This assumption is also present in add_submodule_odb() (used by show_submodule_summary()) and is_submodule_modified(), so i just reused it. This should be addressed in another patch.What about this one:Looks sensible to me. Thanks, and sorry for not catching this earlier.
While glancing over add_submodule_odb(): It protects against adding a /new/ odb twice, but assuming the submodules objects later live in the odb of the superproject too it will happily add that to the alt_odb_list the first time it sees it, no? Not knowing the odb code, would it make sense to protect against that? Or does adding the superprojects .git/objects to the alt_odb_list have no negative consequences?