Re: Re*: [PATCH v9] Documentation/remote-helpers: Add invocation section

Hi,

I like the idea, but I think it's too verbose. Perhaps something along
these lines?

1. In general, base your patches on 'master'.
2. If your patch is a bugfix try to base it on 'maint'. If the bug's
in 'master, but not in 'maint' also, base it on 'master'.
3. If you're working on a feature, some of whose patches are already
in 'pu', base your work on the tip of the last commit in your topic
branch (See THIS). If it's a minor correction, you might want to add a
note asking the maintainer to squash it into the previous commit.
4. If you're working on an elaborate feature that depends on many
commits in 'pu', maintain a public branch based on 'pu', and
periodically post patches to the mailing list for feedback (all based
on 'pu'). You might have to rebase/ wait before it's finally merged.

THIS:

+   work on the tip of the topic.  "log --first-parent master..pu" would be
+   a good way to find the tips of topic branches.

+ "The grandparent of this merge commit is your latest commit in this
topic. This is the commit you should base your patch on."

-- Ram