Re: [PATCH v9] Documentation/remote-helpers: Add invocation section
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:34
Hi, On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] wrote:
Thank you for this. FWIW I find it useful when discussing a piece of code or documentation to bounce back and forth multiple versions of small fragments. Then once the discussion has settled down, it can be useful to see the big picture again, with the new changes incorporated.
Got it. In future, I'll post diffs for smaller changes hopefully in the same email thread, and complete patches for larger changes in a separate email thread. I've been quite haphazard in the past.
If you want to make sure the latest version of a patch is always available, that is a noble goal, too, but I think a frequently- rebased public branch for your patch series is a better way to achieve that.
Ah, I already do that, but my branch is based on `pu`. What should I do? http://github.com/artagnon/git On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
At least it would be helpful for me if people based their follow-up patches on top of their own topics.
Can I see the topic branch corresponding to my patches? If this is possible, I can avoid the more painful procedure of extracting it from the latest pu using git-resurrect.sh. -- Ram