Re: [PATCH 0/7 (v5)] rev-cache

In case people are wondering what the message Björn is responding to
said...

  From: Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]
  Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 (v5)] rev-cache
  Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 23:49:57 -0700
  References: [ref]
  Message-ID: [off-list ref]

  Björn, I thought your "apply --whitespace=fix" patch was supposed to be
  able to cope with this series whose [2/7] introduces a new file with a
  trailing blank line "t/t6019-rev-cache-list.sh" (which is correctly fixed
  not to have that extra blank line at the end), and then a subsequent patch
  in the series [3/7] still tries to apply a patch assuming that the extra
  blank line was still there.

  But that is apparently not the case.  I think your series dealt only for
  the cases where the additional contents came _after_ the fixed-and-gone
  blank lines, and never dealt with the case where such lines appear in the
  context.

The message didn't go to vger because I botched while editing To/Cc lines.