Re: native-git-svn: A Summer of Code 2010 proposal

Hi,

The flow looks good (although I had to jump through hoops to look at it, I
am reading mails via ssh'ed text console).

In that case, I shouldn't put any crucial information in the figure
like the timeline, in the interest of several reviewers who might be
in a similar position.

I have to admit that I would prefer a more detailed timeline, if only to
show how well you understand the individual requirements of trying to
interpret the fast-import protocol in an svn context.

Is the timeline in the text of the proposal detailed enough? I'm
planning to submit that, and remove the one in the figure.

-- Ram