Re: [PATCH] Use test_expect_success for test setups

Brian Gernhardt [off-list ref] writes:

Several tests did not use test_expect_success for their setup
commands.  Putting these start commands into the testing framework
means both that errors during setup will be caught quickly and that
non-error text will be suppressed without -v.

Nice.  Should the one in 4103 be three separate tests?  They seem to be
preparing the set of test input files and are not expected to fail (unless
of course you are futzing with diff-tree, but for that we have t4013).