Re: git cherry-pick --continue?

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Hmm. I was thinking "am" was the odd man out, but really there are only
two sequencer commands that I noted: rebase and am. So you could perhaps
argue that rebase should also learn "--resolved". Or am I forgetting
one?

Having said all I did in the previous message, I think "am --continue"
would be a good addition.

And "rebase --resolved" would not make any sense if the reason the control
is given back to you was because you ran "rebase -i" and marked a commit
to be "edit"ed.  Of course, we could add "--resolved" and "--edited" (or
perhaps "--amended") to "rebase", and have it make sure that the correct
one is given.  For example, when it stopped for "edit", it would reject
"rebase --resolved".  But I do not think it is worth the hassle.