Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] t9501: Skip testing load if we can't detect it

From: Brian Gernhardt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:11

On Feb 6, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Here is my attempt to reword the commit log message from Brian (the  
"-1"
one, squashed into a revert of the one from yesterday, the latter of  
which
I already pushed out).  I just added the first paragraph to better  
justify
the reason why we are testing the codepath that would never be  
exercised
in real life on platforms that lack /proc/loadavg.
Looks good to me.
   Subject: t9501: Re-fix max load test

   Revert the previous attempt to skip this test on platforms where we
   currently cannot determine the system load.  We want to make sure  
that
   the max-load-limit codepath produces results cleanly, when gitweb  
is
   updated and becomes capable of reading the load average by some  
other
   method.

   The code to check for load returns 0 if it doesn't know how to find
   load.  It also checks to see if the current load is higher than the
   max load.  So to force the script to quit early by setting the  
maxload
   variable negative which should work for systems where we can detect
   load (which should be a positive number) and systems where we can't
   (where detected load is 0)

   Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt [off-list ref]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help