Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Thanks for catching this.
In this particular case, I however suspect that it would be cleaner to
declare that the first parameter to resolve_undo_read() is a "char *"
(or even "const char *"), as we are dealing with NUL delimited list of
octal numbers and character strings.
It would look like this. I wonder if we should make hash*() inline
functions to take (void *) or (const void *) pointers to avoid further
noises like this but that would be a separate topic.
resolve-undo.c | 4 ++--
resolve-undo.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/resolve-undo.c b/resolve-undo.c
index 37d73cd..0f50ee0 100644
--- a/resolve-undo.c
+++ b/resolve-undo.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ void resolve_undo_write(struct strbuf *sb, struct string_list *resolve_undo)
for_each_string_list(write_one, resolve_undo, sb);
}
-struct string_list *resolve_undo_read(void *data, unsigned long size)
+struct string_list *resolve_undo_read(const char *data, unsigned long size)
{
struct string_list *resolve_undo;
size_t len;@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct string_list *resolve_undo_read(void *data, unsigned long size)
continue;
if (size < 20)
goto error;
- hashcpy(ui->sha1[i], data);
+ hashcpy(ui->sha1[i], (const unsigned char *)data);
size -= 20;
data += 20;
}
diff --git a/resolve-undo.h b/resolve-undo.h
index e4e5c1b..8458769 100644
--- a/resolve-undo.h
+++ b/resolve-undo.h
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ struct resolve_undo_info {
extern void record_resolve_undo(struct index_state *, struct cache_entry *);
extern void resolve_undo_write(struct strbuf *, struct string_list *);
-extern struct string_list *resolve_undo_read(void *, unsigned long);
+extern struct string_list *resolve_undo_read(const char *, unsigned long);
extern void resolve_undo_clear_index(struct index_state *);
extern int unmerge_index_entry_at(struct index_state *, int);
extern void unmerge_index(struct index_state *, const char **);