Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2010, #06; Wed, 20)
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:04
Johan Herland [off-list ref] writes:
In any case, I totally understand if you'd rather want to hold the entire notes series in 'pu', and instead focus on fixing the bugs in what's already been released.
That is a different issue than what to do with the first three that people have been using from 'next'. As I want to close the -rc0 by the end of this week, I've merged these early ones to 'master'. Tentatively I had to drop the remainder of 'jh/notes' from 'pu', but that is not because I didn't like what was in the series. From the discussion of last night, a patch to squelch "Notes: " output in "format-patch" was queued and it is meant for 1.6.6.X series, but the precondition a new test in that fix relies on in t3301 (i.e. fourth commit having a certain notes) is changed in jh/notes series and merging it makes the tests break. I haven't gotten around looking into its details, but the fix patch needs to be in 'master' soon, and the first patches from 'jh/notes' are already in 'master', so probably we would want to rebase the remainder on top of updated 'master' when 1.7.0-rc0 is tagged.