Ilari Liusvaara [off-list ref] writes:
Add --set-upstream option to branch that works like --track, except that
when branch exists already, its upstream info is changed without changing
the ref value.
Based-on-patch-from: Matthieu Moy [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <redacted>
I'm short on Git time budget, so I happily let you take over on this
patch.
I'm a bit worried about the vocabulary: my understanding is that
"--track" is considered confusing, and should have been called
"--set-upstream" since the beginning.
With your patch, we have both --set-upstream and --track, with
different meanings. Should we consider --track as semi-deprecated, and
--set-upstream as "--track done right"? If so, you can consider
squashing this to promote your option instead of --track, and perhaps
reword git-branch.txt so that --track says it does like
--set-upstream, and not the other way around.
diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt
index b169836..4c66f19 100644
--- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt
+++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt
@@ -2114,12 +2114,12 @@ linkgit:git-fetch[1] to keep them up-to-date; see
Now create the branches in which you are going to work; these start out
at the current tip of origin/master branch, and should be set up (using
-the --track option to linkgit:git-branch[1]) to merge changes in from
+the --set-upstream option to linkgit:git-branch[1]) to merge changes in from
Linus by default.
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git branch --track test origin/master
-$ git branch --track release origin/master
+$ git branch --set-upstream test origin/master
+$ git branch --set-upstream release origin/master
-------------------------------------------------
These can be easily kept up to date using linkgit:git-pull[1].
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/