Re: default behaviour for `gitmerge` (no arguments)
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:00
Hi, On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
I wondered why it doesn't hook into interpret_branch_name(), and instead adds itself to the static substitute_branch_name(); it forbids the use of the syntax from by callers of strbuf_branchname().I _think_ it was to allow something like git log -g @{u} but frankly, this is so long ago, I do not remember, I reconstructed this reasoning as being the most likely.That is not the question I was asking. If you compare substitute_branch_name() and interpret_branch_name() before your patch, you will notice that they are _meant_ to do the same thing, with different external API, only because many callers in sha1_name.c do not use strbuf to hold their names. The primary API is the latter (which is extern), and the former (which is static) is merely a helping wrapper that is internal to sha1_name.c
So you meant to say that substitute_branch_name() calls interpret_branch_name(), so the change should be in the latter. (This is supposed to be the summary of your 4 paragraphs.) I have no problems with that, except that I do not have the time to do it myself. Ciao, Dscho